You are here

Головна » Scientific Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2'2024

Chemical composition of physical and technological properties of broiler turkey meat in the case of application of the prebiotic Actigen

Recently, pre and probiotics have been widely distributed in poultry farming as environmentally friendly and non-harmful drugs. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the chemical composition and physical and technological properties of broiler turkey meat using the prebiotic Actigen. Research was carried out during 2022–2023 at the Department of Veterinary and Sanitary Examination, Hygiene of Livestock Products and Pathanatomy named after Y.S. Zagaevskiy Bila Tserkva NAU. Experimental experiments and scientific and practical observations were carried out in the conditions of "Volodar" LLC of Tetiiv district of Kyiv region and the accredited laboratory: Stavyshche interdistrict state laboratory of the State Production and Consumer Service of Ukraine. We used: organoleptic, physicochemical, biochemical and variational and statistical research methods. The chemical composition of the samples of the pectoral and thigh muscles of the (poultry), in terms of the content of proteins, the amino acid tryptophan prevailed in the experimental samples compared to the control samples. Thus, the concentration of proteins in the test samples increased by 1.0-1.2 times, and the amino acid tryptophan by 1.0-1.03 times. The protein-quality index (PRI) also increased by 0.62−1.67% (р<0.05) and the caloric value (in 1 kg of meat) +3.4−11.6%. According to other indicators, there was no significant difference in both the experimental and control groups. According to the physical and technological indicators, no noticeable difference between the experimental groups was established. However, as the duration of prebiotic use increases, the indicators of the moisture retention capacity of the pectoral and femoral muscles probably increase to 61.19% (Р<0.05). A similar dependence has been established for the thigh muscles, which have a large physical load. Thus, during the evaluation of the chemical composition and physical and technological properties of the meat of broiler turkeys with the use of the prebiotic Actigen, it was established that it meets the veterinary and sanitary requirements for quality and safety, in the absence of contamination by microflora.

Key words: meat industry, turkey farming, physico-chemical, chemical, technological indicators, quality, food product, consumer.

KONOPELKO A. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-6746


LYASOTA V. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2442-2174


  1. Abd El-Hack, M.E., El-Saadony., Shafi, M.T. (2020). Probiotyky ta kormy dlia ptytsi: kompleksnyi ohliad [Probiotics n poultry feed: A comprehensive review]. Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl), 104 (6), рр. 1835–1850. DOI:10.1111/jpn.13454.
  2. Al-Khalaifah, H.S. (2018). Perevahy probiotykiv ta/abo prebiotykiv dlia ptytsi zi znyzhenym pryiomom antybiotykiv [Benefits of probiotics and/or prebiotics for antibiotic-reduced poultry]. Poult Sci, 97 (11), рр. 3807–3815. DOI:10.3382/ps/pey160.
  3. Areq Yahya, A.-B. (2021). Vplyv sporo-lex i analcim-si na mikrofloru shlunkovo-kyshkovoho traktu ptytsi [Influence of sporo-lex and analcim-si on the microflora of the bird’s gastrointestinal tract]. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi visnyk Derzhavnoho naukovo-doslidnoho kontrolnoho instytutu veterynarnykh preparativ i kormovykh dobavok ta Instytutu biolohii tvaryn [Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the State Scientific Research Control Institute of Veterinary Medical Products and Fodder Additives and the Institute of Animal Biology]. 22(2), рр. 25–32. DOI:10.36359/scivp.2021-22-2.02.
  4. Baştürk, A., Artan, R., Yılmaz, A. (2016). Efektyvnist synbiotykiv, probiotykiv i prebiotykiv pry syndromi podraznenoho kyshechnyka u ditei: randomizovane kontrolovane doslidzhennia [Efficacy of synbiotic, probiotic, and prebiotic treatments for irritable bowel syndrome in children: A randomized controlled trial]. Turk. J. Gastroenterol, 27 (5), рр. 439–443. DOI:10.5152/tjg.2016.16301.
  5. Berri, С. Cecile. (2015). Variabelnist sensornykh i obrobnykh yakostei miasa ptytsi [Variability of Sensory and Processing Gualities of Poultry Meat]. Svitove ptakhivnytstvo [World’s Poultry Science], 56 (3), рр. 209–224. DOI:10.1079/WPS20000016.
  6. Biben, I.A. (2023). Imunokorektsiia kurei probiotychnoiu kulturoiu bak Subtilis BI-12 as a alternative to [Immunocorrection of chickens with probiotic culture bac Subtilis BI-12 as an alternative to]. Naukovyi visnyk LNUVMB imeni S.Z. Gzhytskoho [Scientific Bulletin of the LNUVMB named after S.Z. Gzhitskyi]. Veterynarni nauky [Veterinary Sciences], Vol. 25, no. 2, 112 p. (In Ukrainian).
  7. Bashtovy, A.V. (2023). Antybiotychnyi zakhyst [Antibiotic protection]. Naukovyi visnyk LNUVMB [Scientific Bulletin of LNUVMB]. Veterynarni nauky [Veterinary Sciences], Issue 25, no. 2, рр. 112−158. (In Ukrainian).
  8. Bogatko, N.M., Bogatko, D.L. (2014). Osoblyvosti vprovadzhennia systemy NASSR na miasopererobnykh pidpryiemstvakh Ukrainy [Features of HACCP system implementation at meat processing enterprises of Ukraine]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoi derzhavnoi zooveterynarnoi akademii [Collection of sciences. Proceedings of the Kharkiv State Veterinary Academy]. Problemy zooinzhenerii ta veterynarii [Problems of zooengineering and veterinary medicine]. Veterynarni nauky [Veterinary Sciences], 28 (2), рр. 49–55. Available at:UJRN/ pzvm_2014_28%282%29__7. (In Ukrainian).
  9. Bogatko, N.M., Bukalova, N.V., Shchurevich, G.P. (2014). Veterynarno-sanitarna ekspertyza produktiv zaboiu ptytsi: metodychni rekomendatsii dlia studentiv IPNKSVM, studentiv ta mahistrantiv FVM [Veterinary and sanitary examination of poultry slaughter products: methodological recommendations for students of IPNKSVM, students and undergraduates of FVM]. Bila Tserkva, 52 р. (In Ukrainian).
  10. Bogatko, N.M., Konstantinov, P.D., Bogatko, L.M. (2016). Veterynarno-sanitarna ekspertyza miasa zabiinykh tvaryn, ptytsi, kroliv: metodychni vkazivky dlia aspirantiv [Veterinary examination of meat of slaughter animals, poultry, rabbits: guide[1]lines for postgraduate students]. Bila Tserkva, 47 р. (In Ukrainian).
  11. Bushueva, I.V., Borysenko, N.M. (2020). Rozdribna torhivlia veterynarnymy imunobiolohichnymy preparatamy na ukrainskomu rynku veterynarnykh vaktsyn [Retail of veterinary immunobiological drugs on the Ukrainian market of veterinary vaccines]. Aktualni problemy farmatsevtychnoi ta medychnoi nauky i praktyky [Current issues of pharmaceutical and medical science and practice]. 13 (1), рр. 21–32. DOI:10.14739/2409-2932.2020.1.198188. (In Ukrainian).
  12. Chudak, R.A. (2021). Suchasni kormovi dobavky v hodivli ptytsi [Modern feed additives in poultry feeding]. Vinnytsia, Works, 210 р. (In Ukrainian).
  13. Ciftciler, R., Ciftciler, A.E. (2022). Znachennia mikrobioty v hematolohii [The importance of microbiota in hematology]. Transfus Apher Sci, 61 (2), 103320. DOI:10.1016/j.transci.2021.103320.
  14. Fabiano, V., Indrio, F., Verduci, E. (2021). Terminovi dytiachi sumishi, shcho vplyvaiut na mikrobiotu kyshechnyka: ohliad [Term Infant Formulas Influencing Gut Microbiota: An Overview]. Nutrients, 13 (12), 4200. DOI:10.3390/nu13124200.
  15. Forkus, B., Ritter, S., Vlysidis, M. (2017). Protymikrobni probiotyky zmenshuiut Salmonella enterica v shlunkovo-kyshkovomu trakti [Antimicrobial probiotics reduce Salmonella enterica in the gastrointestinal tract]. Turkey Tracts, 7, 40695. DOI:10.1038/srep40695.
  16. Karadag, A.S., Kayıran, M.A., Parish, L.C. (2020). Probiotyky ta prebiotyky - khoroshi mikroby: dermatolohichna perspektyva [Probiotics and Prebiotics-The Good Germs: A Dermatologic Perspective]. Skinmed, 18 (1), pp. 10−13. Avaiable at:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32167449.
  17. Karakan, T., Tuohy, K.M., Janssen-van Solin[1]gen, G. (2021). Laktuloza v nyzkykh dozakh yak prebiotyk dlia pokrashchennia zdorovia kyshechnyka ta pokrashchennia zasvoiennia mineraliv [Low-Dose Lactulose as a Prebiotic for Improved Gut Health and Enhanced Mineral Absorption]. Front Nutr, 8, 672925. DOI:10.3389/fnut.2021.672925.
  18. Kasyanenko, O.I. (2016). Eksperymentalne obgruntuvannia ekonomichnoi efektyvnosti systemy borotby z bakteriozom ptytsi [Experimental substantiation of economic efficiency of bird control bacteriosis control system]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu [Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University]. Sumy, SNAU, 11 (39), рр. 122−126. (In Ukrainian).
  19. Kasyanenko, O.I., Nagornaya, L.V., Kasyanenko, S.M. (2018). Efektyvnist zastosuvannia Aktyvenu pry vyroshchuvanni kachok [The effectiveness of the use of actigen in the cultivation of ducks]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu [Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University]. Veterynarna medytsyna [Veterinary Medicine], 11 (43), рр. 57–61. Available at:https://repo.snau.edu.ua/bit[1]stream/123456789/6576/1/7.pdf. (In Ukrainian).
  20. Kaur, A.P., Bhardwaj, S., Dhanjal, D.S. (2021). Roslynni prebiotyky ta yikh rol u polehshenni zakhvoriuvan [Plant Prebiotics and Their Role in the Amelioration of Diseases]. Biomolekuly [Biomolecules], 11(3), рр. 440−456. DOI:10.3390/biom11030440.
  21. Kirilyuk, D.O. (2014). Analiz potochnoho stanu rynku miasa ptytsi v Ukraini [Analysis of the current state of the poultry market in Ukraine]. Ekonomika ahropromyslovoho kompleksu [Economics of agroindustrial complex], 2, рр. 116–119. (In Ukrainian).
  22. Kitaeva, D. V., Petrov, R. V. (2020). Vykorystannia probiotykiv pry vyroshchuvanni indykiv [The use of probiotics in the cultivation of turkeys]. Naukovyi visnyk LNU veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii [Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies]. Veterynarni nauky [Veterinary Sciences], 22 (100), рр. 23–27. DOI:10.32718/ nvlvet10004. (In Ukrainian).
  23. Konopelko, A. V. (2021). Tekhnolohii rozvedennia indykiv – suchasni pidkhody: Materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii Ahrarna osvita i nauka: dosiahnennia, rol, faktory zrostannia. Suchasnyi rozvytok veterynarnoi medytsyny [Technologies of turkey breeding - modern approaches: Proceedings of the international scientific-practical conference Agricultural education and science: achievements, role, growth factors. Modern development of veterinary medicine]. Bila Tserkva, рр. 3−4. (In Ukrainian).
  24. Konopelko, A.V., Lyasota, V.P. (2021). Efektyvnist zastosuvannia prebiotychnoho preparatu Aktihen dlia vyroshchuvannia indykiv miasnoho napriamu produktyvnosti [Effectiveness of the use of the prebiotic preparation Aktigen for growing turkeys of the meat direction of productivity]. Naukovyi visnyk veterynarnoi medytsyny [Scientific Bulletin of Veterinary Medicine]. 2, рр. 37–48. DOI:10.33245/2310-4902-2021-168-2-37-48. (In Ukrainian).
  25. Lieranlier, N., Gökcen, B. B., Sezgin, A. C. (2017). Koryst dlia zdorovia fermentovanykh produktiv [Health benefits of fermented foods]. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 59 (3), рр. 506–527. DOI:10.1080/10408398.2017.
  26. Lyasota, V.P., Kolodka, A.V. (2020). Hihiienichno-biotychni faktory zastosuvannia suchasnykh pre- ta probiotykiv u ptakhivnytstvi [Hygiene-biotic factors on the application of modern preand probiotics in poultry]. Naukovyi visnyk LNU veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii [Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies]. 22 (98), рр. 88–93. DOI:10.32718/nvlvet9816 (In Ukrainian).
  27. Maksimovska, S.V. (2009). Hihiienichne obgruntuvannia zastosuvannia probiotyka «Baikal» EM 1 pry vyroshchuvanni indykiv biloi shyrokohrudoi porody [Hygienic rationale for the use of the probiotic “Baikal” EM 1 in growing turkeys of the white broad-breasted breed]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii imeni S. Z. Gzhytskoho [Scientific Bulletin of the Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S. Z. Gzhitskoho]. 11 (41), рр. 149–159. (In Ukrainian).
  28. Melekoglu, E., Cetinkaya, M.A., Kepekci-Tekkeli. (2021). Vplyv prebiotychnoho inulinu, zbahachenoho olihofruktozoiu, na kyshkovi uremichni toksyny ta prohresuvannia zakhvoriuvannia u shchuriv iz khronichnoiu khvoroboiu nyrok, sprychynenoiu adeninom [Effects of prebiotic oligofructose-enriched inulin on gut-derived uremic toxins and disease progression in rats with adenineinduced chronic kidney disease]. PLoS One, 16 (10), e0258145. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0258145.
  29. Tsap, O.S. (2020). Naukovo-praktychne obgruntuvannia zastosuvannia probiotykiv dlia pidvyshchennia yakosti produktsii ptakhivnytstva [Scientific and practical justification of the use of probiotics to improve the quality of poultry products]. Theoretical and practical approach [Teoretychnyi i praktychnyi pidkhid]. Applied veterinary medicine [Prykladna veterynarna medytsyna], 8 (4), рр. 241– 245. DOI:10.32819/2020.84034. (In Ukrainian).
  30. Peredera, O.O., Peredera, R.V. (2022). Zakhody z likvidatsii salmonelozu broileriv v osobystykh hospodarstvakh [Measures to eliminate broiler salmonellosis in private households]. Naukovyi visnyk LNUVMB imeni S.Z. Gzhytskoho [Scientific Messenger LNUVMB]. Veterynarni nauky [Veterinary sciences], no. 112, Vol. 25, рр. 112−159. DOI:10.31210/visnyk2022.01.18. (In Ukrainian).
  31. Podolyan, Yu.M. (2017). Vplyv probiotykiv na yakist miasa kurchat-broileriv [Influence of probiotics on the quality of broiler chickens]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Vinnytskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu [Collection of scientific works of Vinnytsia National Agrarian University]. 6 (46), рр. 63–66 (In Ukrainian).
  32. HOST 7702.2.7–95. Miaso ptytsi, subprodukty ta napivfabrykaty z ptytsi. Metody vyiavlennia bakterii protei. Miaso-yaiechni produkty (1996). [Data vvedennia 1996-01-01]. T. 4. [GOST 7702.2.7–95. Poultry, offal and semi-finished products from poultry. Methods of detection of Proteus bacteria. Meat and egg products (1996). [Introduction date 1996-01-01]. T.4.]. M., Standarty Publishing House, 2000, 284 p.
  33. Rahimi, S., Kathariou, S., Fletcher, O. (2019). Vplyv mikroorhanizmiv i prebiotykiv priamoho zghodovuvannia na produktyvnist i histomorfolohiiu kyshechnyka indychat, zarazhenykh Salmonella i Campylobacter [Effect of a direct-fed microbial and prebiotic on performance and intestinal histomorophology of turkey poults challenged with Salmonella and Campylobacter]. Poult Sci., 98 (12), рр. 6572– 6578. DOI:10.3382/ps/pez436.
  34. Sanlier, N., Kocabas, Yu. (2021). Vplyv probiotykiv, prebiotykiv i mikrobioty kyshechnyka na RAS: ohliad i maibutni perspektyvy [The effect of probiotic, prebiotic and gut microbiota on ASD: A review and future perspectives]. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 63 (15), рр. 2319–2330. DOI:10.1080/104083 98.2021.1973957.
  35. Shcherbatyy, A.R., Slivinska, L.G. (2021). Ohliad: poshyrenist i struktura obminnykh zakhvoriuvan kurei-nesuchok, yikh vplyv na yakist yaiets i stan molodniaku [Overview: prevalence and structure of metabolic diseases of laying chickens, their influence on egg quality and condition of young chickens]. Naukovyi visnyk LNU veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii [Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies]. Veterynarni nauky [Veterinary Sciences], 23 (104), рр. 3–9. DOI:10.32718/nvlvet10401. (In Ukrainian).
  36. Skvortsova, L.N. (2020). Vykorystannia prebiotykiv – realnyi sposib vyrostyty molodniak [The use of prebiotic drugs - a real way to raise young birds]. Ptakhivnytstvo Ukrainy [Poultry of Ukraine], 2 (26), рр. 23–25 (In Ukrainian).
  37. Vlizlo, V.V., Fedorchuk, R.S., Ratych, I.B. (2012). Laboratorni metody doslidzhen u biolohii, tvarynnytstvi ta veterynarii: posibnyk [Laboratory methods of research in biology, animal husbandry and veterinary medicine: a guide]. Lviv, SPOLOM, 253 р. (In Ukrainian).
  38. Yakubchak, O.M. (2022). Zbirnyk naukovo-metodychnykh rekomendatsii z veterynarno-sanitarnoi ekspertyzy [Collection of scientific and methodological recommendations for veterinary and sanitary examination]. K., Bioprom, рр. 104–117. (In Ukrainian).
  39. Yakubchak, O.M., Kozlovska, G.V., Bilyk, R.I. (2016). Miaso ptytsi: osoblyvosti morfolohichnoho ta khimichnoho skladu [Poultry meat: peculiarities of morphological and chemical composition]. Suchasne ptakhivnytstvo [Modern poultry farming], 2, рр. 6–7. (In Ukrainian).
AttachmentSize
PDF icon konopelko_2_2024.pdf665.56 KB
Scientific Journal of Veterinary Medicine 2'2024