You are here

The practice of live animal’s forensic veterinary examination with signs of injury

The disposition of Article 299 Part 1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine provides criminal liability for animal’s cruel treatment, including for inflicting bodily harm in the injury form. However, regulations and sources of scientific literature don’t contain a definition of the animal mutilation concept and the procedure for its establishment. Therefore, the aim of the study was to analyze the practice of forensic veterinary examination of animal’s bodily injuries, which resulted in injury. The article shows that the author's definition of "animal mutilation" is a persistent disorder of animal health due to injury or its consequences, congenital malformations, diseases, accidents that led to complete or partial loss of any organ or animal body part, or to the total or partial loss of only the functions of the organ or parts of the animal's body, which in the interaction of the animal with the environment may lead to permanent loss or significant limitation of the ability to provide physiological manifestations at the level of other animals of the same species(nutrition, reproduction, orientation and movement in space, coordination of movements, natural lifestyles, contact with other animals, self-defense, ability to perform useful work, etc.), and distorts the appearance of the animal due to mutilation of body parts due to deformation, and their physical absence. The purpose of a live subject with signs of injury forensic veterinary examination is to determine the location, nature, severity of damage to animal health, nature of the injury, the degree of disability of the animal in connection with the injury, as well as solving other tasks within the competence of forensic veterinary expert, as well as at the request of the body or person who appointed the expertise or involved the expert. It was stated that the forensic veterinary examination objects are live experimental animals in order to establish their mutilation, including victims of abuse or other illegal actions, as well as signs of congenital malformations, pathological conditions that developed during breeding, animal’s exploitation and transportation; accidents. It was found out that the subjects of forensic veterinary examination of the subject for the purpose of establishing its mutilation are veterinarians who have higher veterinary education, have been trained in forensic veterinary examination in the expert specialty 18.1 "Veterinary Research" and have the forensic veterinary expert qualification. When deciding on the infliction of an animal bodily injuries that caused its injury, the forensic veterinary expert must use the "Rules of forensic veterinary determination of the severity of damage to animal health" and the "Methodology of forensic veterinary examination of animals to determine their injury".

Key words: animals, mutilation, injuries, ill-treatment, forensic veterinary examination.

  1. Carlisle-Frank, P.,Frank, J. M.,Nielsen, L. (2004). Selective battering of the family pet. Anthrozoos. 17 (1), pp. 26–42. DOI:10.2752/089279304786991864.
  2. Henry, B. C. (2004). The relationship between animal cruelty, delinquency, and attitudes toward the treatment of animals. Society & animals. Vol. 12 (3), pp. 185–207. DOI:10.1163/1568530042880677.
  3. Beirne, P. (1999). For a nonspeciesist criminology: Animal abuse as an object of study. Criminology. Vol. 37 (1), pp. 117–147. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999. tb00481.x.
  4. Almeida, D. C.,Torres, S. M. F.,Wuenschmann, A. (2018). Retrospective analysis of necropsy reports suggestive of abuse in dogs and cats. Javma-journal of the american veterinary medical association. Vol. 252 (4), pp. 433–439.
  5. Rowan, A. N. (1993). Cruelty to animals. Anthrozoos. Vol. 6 (4), pp. 218–220. DOI: 10.2752/ 089279393787002169.
  6. Vermeulen, H., Odendaal, J. S. J. (1993). Proposed typology of companion animal abuse. Anthrozoos. Vol. 6 (4), pp. 248–257. DOI:10.2752/089279393787 002178.
  7. de Siqueira, A.,Cuevas, S. E. C.,Salvagni, F. A.,Maiorka, P. C. (2016). Forensic Veterinary Pathology: Sharp Injuries in Animals. Veterinary pathology. Vol. 53 (5), pp. 979–987. DOI:10.1177/0300985816655850.
  8. Ford, J., Alleyne, E., Blake, E., Somers, A. (2020). A descriptive model of the offence process for animal abusers: evidence from a community sample. Psychology crime & law. Vol. 27, pp. 324–340. DOI:10.1080/1068316X. 2020.1798430.
  9. Flynn, C. P. (2001). Acknowledging the «zoological connection»: A sociological analysis of animal cruelty – Commentary. Society&animals. Vol. 9 (1), pp. 71–87. DOI:10.1163/156853001300109008.
  10. Sims, V. K., Chin, M. G., Yordon, R. E. (2007). Don't be cruel: Assessing beliefs about punishments for crimes against animals. A multidisciplinary journal of the interactions between people and other animals. Vol. 20 (3), pp. 251–259. DOI:10.2752/089279307X224791.
  11. Alleyne, E., Parfitt, C. (2019). Adult-Perpetrated Animal Abuse: A Systematic Literature Review. Trauma violence & abuse. Vol. 20 (3), pp. 344–357. DOI:10.1177%2F1524838017708785.
  12. Yatsenko I. V., Kyrychenko V. M. (2013). Istoryko-pravovi aspekty problemy zahystu tvaryn vid zhorstokogo povodzhennja [Historical and legal aspects of the problem of protecting animals from cruelty]. Problemy zooinzhenerii' ta veterynarnoi' medycyny [Problems of animal engineering and veterinary medicine]. Kharkiv, vol. 27 (2), pp. 240–258.
  13. Zubchenko, N. I. (2016). Mizhnarodno-pravove spivrobitnyctvo derzhav u sferi zabezpechennja dobrobutu tvaryn ta i'h zahystu vid zhorstokogo povodzhennja: monografija; pid nauk. red. T.R. Korotkogo [International legal cooperation of states in the field of ensuring the welfare of animals and their protection from cruelty: monograph; under science ed. T.R. Korotkoho]. Odesa: Phoenix, 284 p.
  14. Synoverska, T. I. (2019). Mizhnarodnyj dosvid rozsliduvannja zhorstokogo povodzhennja z tvarynamy ta naprjamy jogo zaprovadzhennja u vitchyznjanu praktyku [International experience of investigating animal cruelty and directions for its introduction into domestic practice]. Naukovyj visnyk publichnogo ta pryvatnogo prava [Scientific bulletin of public and private law]. Issue 1 (1), pp. 222–228. DOI:10.32844/2618- 1258.2019.1-1.38.
  15. Holovko, I. A. (2010). Kryminalna vidpovidalnist za zhorstoke povodzhennia z tvarynamy: avtoref. dys. kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.08; Kyiv. nats. un-t vnutr. sprav [Criminal responsibility for cruelty to animals: abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences: 12.00.08; Kyiv. national University of Internal Affairs affairs]. Kyiv, 20 p.
  16. Shumilo, O. O. (2016). Kryminologichna harakterystyka ta zapobigannja zhorstokomu povodzhennju z tvarynamy: avtoreferat dysertacii' kandydata jurydychnyh nauk: 12.00.08. [Criminological characteristics and prevention of cruelty to animals: abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences: 12.00.08.]. Klasychnyj pryvatnyj universtet [Classical private university]. Zaporizhzhia, 20 p.
  17. Poltava, K.O. (2020). Kryminologichna ocinka rivnja i dynamiky zhorstokogo povodzhennja z tvarynamy v Ukrai'ni ta naprjamy jogo zapobigannja [Criminological assessment of the level and dynamics of animal cruelty in Ukraine and directions for its prevention]. Pravo i suspil'stvo [Law and society]. Issue 1 (1), pp. 129–136. DOI:10.32842/2078-3736/2020.1-2.22.
  18. Uvarova, N.V. (2018). Do problemy kryminal'noi' vidpovidal'nosti za zhorstoke povodzhennja z tvarynamy [To the problem of criminal liability for animal cruelty]. Naukovyj visnyk Dnipropetrovs'kogo derzhavnogo universytetu vnutrishnih sprav [Scientific Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs]. no. 4, pp. 138–140. DOI:10.31733/2078- 3566-2018-6-138-140.
  19. Kalmykov, D.O., Danylevskyi, A.O. (2013). Kryminal'na ta administratyvna vidpovidal'nist' za zhorstoke povodzhennja z tvarynamy: monografija [Criminal and administrative liability for cruelty to animals: monograph]. Luhansk: RVV LDUVS named after E.O. Didorenko, 615 p.
  20. Verbitska, M. V. (2014). Jurydychna vidpovidal'nist' za zhorstoke povodzhennja z tvarynamy [Legal responsibility for animal cruelty]. Naukovyj visnyk Hersons'kogo derzhavnogo universytetu [Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University]. Serija jurydychni nauky [Series of legal sciences]. Vol. 1 (3), pp. 9–14.
  21. Pro vnesennja zmin do dejakyh zakonodavchyh aktiv Ukrai'ny shhodo implementacii' polozhen' dejakyh mizhnarodnyh ugod ta dyrektyv JeS u sferi ohorony tvarynnogo ta roslynnogo svitu: Zakon Ukrai'ny № 1684-IX vid 15.07.2021. [On the introduction of changes to some legislative acts of Ukraine regarding the implementation of the provisions of some international agreements and EU directives in the field of animal and plant protection: Law of Ukraine No. 1684-Х of 15.07.2021.]. Available at: zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text (data zvernennia – 5.02.2022).
  22. Connor, M., Cowan, S. L. (2020). Consumer evaluation of far animal mutilations. Research in veterinary science. Vol. 128, pp. 35–42. DOI:10.1016/ j.rvsc.2019.10.006.
  23. Yatsenko I. V., Derecha L. M., Parylovskyi O. I. (2021). Novitni naukovi j praktychni zdobutky ta perspektyvy rozvytku sudovo-veterynarnoi' ekspertyzy zhyvyh tvaryn v Ukrai'ni [The latest scientific and practical achievements and prospects for the development of forensic veterinary examination of live animals in Ukraine]. Aktual'ni pytannja ta perspektyvy rozvytku sudovoi' ekspertyzy ta kryminalistyky: materialy Mizhnarodnoi' naukovo-praktychnoi' konferencii' (m. Odesa, 3 veresnja 2021 roku) [Current issues and prospects for the development of forensic examination and criminology: materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Odesa, September 3, 2021)]. Odesa: Helvetica Publishing House, pp. 368–373.
  24. Yatsenko, I. V., Parylovskyi, O. I., Zhylina, V. M. (2020). Porjadok sudovo-veterynarnogo vstanovlennja stupenja tjazhkosti shkody, zapodijanoi' zdorov’ju tvaryny [The procedure for forensic veterinary determination of the degree of severity of damage caused to the animal's health]. Naukovyj visnyk L'vivs'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu veterynarnoi' medycyny ta biotehnologij imeni S.Z. G'zhyc'kogo [Scientific Bulletin of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S.Z. Gzhytskogo] Veterynarni nauky [Veterinary sciences]. Issue 22 (99), pp. 182–192. DOI:10.32718/nvlvet9928.
  25. Gerdin, J. A., McDonough, S. P. (2013). Forensic Pathology of Companion Animal Abuse and Neglect. Veterinary pathology. Vol. 50 (6), pp. 994–1006. DOI:10.1177/0300985813488895.
  26. Acutt, D., Signal, T., Taylor, N. (2015). Mandated Reporting of Suspected Animal Harm by Australian Veterinarians: Community Attitudes. Anthrozoos. Vol. 28 (3), pp. 437–447. DOI:10.1080/08927936.201 5.1052276.
  27. Arkow, P. (2015). Recognizing and responding to cases of suspected animal cruelty, abuse, and neglect: what the veterinarian needs to know. Veterinary medicine-research and reports. Vol. 6, pp. 349–359. DOI:10.2147/VMRR.S87198.
  28. Benetato, M. A., Reisman, R., McCobb, E. (2011). The veterinarian's role in animal cruelty cases. Javma-journal of the american veterinary medical association. Vol. 238 (1), pp. 31–34. DOI:10.2460/javma.238.1.31.
  29. Patronek, G. J. (1997). Issues for veterinarians in recognizing and reporting animal neglect and abuse. Society & animals. Vol. 5 (3), pp. 267–280. DOI:10.1163/156853097X00178.
  30. McDonough, S. P., McEwen, B. J. (2016) Veterinary Forensic Pathology: The Search for Truth. Veterinary pathology. Vol. 53 (5), pp. 875–877. DOI:10.1177/0300985816647450.
  31. Ottinger, T., Rasmusson, B., Segerstad, C. H. A., Merck, M., Goot, F. V. D., Olsen, L., Gavier-Widen, D. (2014). Forensic veterinary pathology, today's situation and perspectives. Veterinary record. Vol. 175 (18). DOI:10.1136/vr.102306.
  32. Byard, R. W., Boardman, W. (2011).The potential role of forensic pathologists in veterinary forensic medicine. Forensic science medicine and pathology. Vol. 7 (3), pp. 231–232. DOI:10.1007/s12024-011- 9241-x.
  33. Listos, P., Gryzinska, M., Kowalczyk, M. (2015). Analysis of cases of forensic veterinary opinions produced in a research and teaching unit. Journal of forensic and legal medicine. Vol. 36, pp. 84–89. DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2015.08.002.
  34. Mills, G. (2013). Proving the crime: how veterinary forensics can help.Veterinaryrecord. Vol. 172(18), 465 p. DOI:10.1136/vr.f2694.
  35. Yatsenko, I.V., Kazantsev, R.H. (2021). Osoblyvosti struktury vysnovku sudovo-veterynarnogo eksperta za rezul'tatamy doslidzhennja trupa ptyci [Peculiarities of the structure of the conclusion of the forensic veterinary expert based on the results of the examination of the poultry carcass]. Naukovyj visnyk L'vivs'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu veterynarnoi' medycyny ta biotehnologij imeni S.Z. G'zhyc'kogo [Scientific Bulletin of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S.Z. Gzhytskogo]. Veterynarni nauky [Veterinary sciences]. Issue 23 (103), pp. 61–78. DOI:10.32718/nvlvet10310.
  36. Yatsenko, I.V., Derecha, L.M., Parylovskyi, O.I. (2020). Osoblyvosti struktury vysnovku sudovo-veterynarnogo ekspertyza za rezul'tatamy doslidzhennja trupa tvaryny z oznakamy nasyl'nyc'koi' smerti [Peculiarities of the structure of the conclusion of the forensic veterinary examination based on the results of the examination of the corpse of an animal with signs of violent death]. Teorijata praktyka sudovoi' ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky: zb. nauk. pr. [Theory and practice of forensic examination and criminology: a collection of scientific works]. Kharkiv: Law, Issue 21, pp. 615–639. DOI:10.32353/khrife.1.2020.44.
  37. Yatsenko, I. V., Parylovskyi, O. I. (2021). Sposib provedennja sudovo-veterynarnoi' ekspertyzy zhyvoi' tvaryny z ukladannja vysnovku sudovogo eksperta [The method of conducting a forensic veterinary examination of a live animal with the conclusion of a forensic expert]. Svidoctvo pro rejestraciju avtors'kogo prava na tvir № 110514. 2021 [Certificate of copyright registration for the work No. 110514. 2021].
  38. Yatsenko, I.V., Parylovskyi, O.I. (2021). Pravyla sudovo-veterynarnogo vyznachennja stupenja tjazhkosti shkody, zapodijanoi' zdorov’ju tvaryny (metodychni rekomendacii') [Rules for forensic-veterinary determination of the degree of severity of damage caused to the animal's health (methodological recommendations)]. Kharkiv: NSC "ISE named after Ex. Prof. M. S. Bokarius", 47 p.
AttachmentSize
PDF icon yatsenko_1_2022.pdf7.05 MB