You are here

Structure of comminuted fractures of long bones in dogs according to the principles of AO/ASIF classification (24 clinical cases)

The study of the structure of morbidity or individual nosological groups of diseases involves not only establishing the degree of their prevalence, but also, depending on the methodology of such studies, makes it possible to identify the prevailing clinical and morphological forms, the objectivity of diagnostic algorithms and the effectiveness of therapeutic measures, which makes it possible to assess the state of the solution or another clinical problem, adjust the ways to solve it and improve clinical management and form directions for improving the market for therapeutic agents. The aim of the work was to establish the structure of the types of different clinical and radiological forms of comminuted bone fractures in dogs according to the principles of the international classification AO/ASIF. We performed a clinical and radiological assessment of comminuted fractures of long bones in dogs (n=24) with spontaneous bone injuries admitted to the Interdepartmental Small Animal Clinic of Belotserkovsky NAU, in which 26 comminuted fractures were diagnosed. The main forcing ship fractures were car accidents - 58.4%, alarming world causas unverified creatures of bloodshed - 20.8%, injuries caused by other creatures - 12.5% and 8.3% - falling from height. According to thestate factor, the removal from white grains is 70.8%, and in 62.5% - animal with weight of 11 kg, and in 54.2% - dogs of different breeds, while 45.8% were outbred. Comminuted fractures according to morphosegmental localization were: diaphyseal - 46.2%, metaphyseal - 42.3%, epiphyseal 11.5%. According to the principles of the international classification AO / ASIF, their largest share - 50%, belongs to type C, 46.2% - to type B and the smallest - 3.8%, to the simplest type A. Within the subgroups of the largest - 19.2 %, the proportion for subgroups B1, B2 and C2 turned out to be slightly less - 15.4% for C1 and C3 and very small - 7.8% and 3.8% for B3 and A2, respectively. Consequently, the morphosegmental localization of the typification of the type and complexity of fractures according to the principles of the AO/ASIF classification provides more detailed information, which creates the basis for the proposed choice of the most rational methods and means of osteosynthesis.

Key words: osteosynthesis, reparative osteogenesis, femur, tibia, radius, ulna, humerus.

  1. Rublenko, S.V., Eroshenko, S.V. (2012). Monіtoring veterinarnoi dopomogi і struktura hіrurgіchnoi patologіi sered drіbnih domashnіh tvarin v umovah mіskoi klіnіki [Monitoring of veterinary care and the structure of surgical pathology among small domestic animals in the conditions of a city clinic]. Bulletin of the Sumy NAU. no. 1 (30), pp. 150–154. (in Ukraine).
  2. Telyatnіkov, A.V. (2013). Poshirennya perelomіv kіstok u sobak [Prevalence of bone fractures in dogs]. Naukovij vіsnik veterinarnoi medicini: zb. nauk. prac. [Scientific Bulletin of Veterinary Medicine: Collection of Scientific Papers]. Issue 11 (101), pp. 149–153. (in Ukraine).
  3. Haas, N., Hauke, C., Schuetz, M. (2001). Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm using the Point Contact Fixator (PC-Fix): Results of 387 fractures of a prospective multicentric study. Injury. Vol. 32, pp. 51–62. DOI:10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00126-7.
  4. Suhonos, V.P., Kiselov, І.G. (2013). Monіtoring travmatizmu drіbnih domashnіh tvarin v umovah mіsta [Monitoring of traumatism of small domestic animals in city conditions]. Vіsnik LNUVMBT іm. S.Z. Gzhickogo [Scientific Bulletin of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S.Z. Gzhytskogo]. no. 3, vol. 15, pp. 329– 332. (in Ukraine).
  5. Pustovіt, R.V., Danilejko, Yu.M., Rublenko, M.V. (2006). Monіtoring hіrurgіchnoi patologіi sered drіbnih domashnіh tvarin DLVM u Kiivskomu rajonі m. Odesi za 2003–2005 roki [Monitoring of surgical pathology among small domestic animals DLVM in the Kyiv district of Odessa for 2003–2005]. Vіsnik Bіlocerkіv. derzh. agrar. un-tu. [Bulletin of Bila Tserkva State Agrarian University]. Issue 36, pp. 132–137. (in Ukraine).
  6. Haaland, P.J., Sjcstrcm, L., Devor, M. (2009). Appendicular fracture repair in dogs using the locking compression plate system: 47 cases. Vet. Comp. Orthop Traumatol. Vol. 4, pp. 309–315. DOI:10.3415/ VCOT08-05-0044
  7. Smurna, O.V. (2009). Zastosuvannja ekstrakortykal'nogo osteosyntezu ta gidroksylapatytu "kergap" pry perelomah klubovoi' kistky u so bak: avtoref. dys. … kand. vet. nauk: spec. 16.00.05. [The use of extracortical osteosynthesis and "kergap" hydroxylapatite for fractures of the iliac bone in dogs: abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of veterinary sciences: specialty 16.00.05.]. Bila Tserkva, 20 p. (in Ukraine).
  8. Shvec, A.I., Ivchenko, V.K., Samojlenko, A.A. (2011). Lechenie perelomov dlinnyh kostej s kostnym defektom [Treatment of long bone fractures with a bone defect]. Trauma. no. 2, vol. 12, pp. 95–98. (in Ukraine).
  9. Libardoni, R.N., Serafini, G.M., Oliveira, C., Schimites, P. I. (2016). Appendicular fractures of traumatic etiology in dogs: 955 cases (2004-2013). Ciência Rural. Vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 45–58. DOI:10.1590/0103- 8478cr20150219
  10. Hudson, C.C., Lewis, D.D., Pozzi, A. (2012). Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in small animals: radius and ulna fractures. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. Vol. 42(5), pp. 983–996.
  11. Shimon, V.M., Stojka, V.V., SHeregіj, A.A. (2017). Bіohіmіchnі markeri stanu kіstkovoi tkanini u hvorih іz perelomami vertlyugovoi dіlyanki stegnovoi kіstki ta tireotoksikozom u dinamіcі vіdnovnogo lіkuvannya [Biochemical markers of the state of bone tissue in patients with fractures of the acetabulum of the femur and thyrotoxicosis in the dynamics of restorative treatment]. Problemi travmatologіi ta osteosintezu [Problems of traumatology and osteosynthesis]. no. 1–2, pp. 68–79. (in Ukraine).
  12. Libardoni, R.N., Costa, D., Menezes, F.B. (2018). Classification, fixation techniques, complications and outcomes of femur fractures in dogs and cats: 61 cases (2015-2016). Ciência Rural, Santa Maria. Vol. 48(06), pp. 1–6. DOI:10.1590/0103-8478cr20170028
  13. Mysak, A.R., Krupnyk, Y.G., Tsisinska, G.V., Dudchak, I.P., Lenjo, Y.M. (2017). Distribution and causes of diseases of the limbs in cattle. Scientific Messenger LNUVMB. Vol. 19(82), pp. 88–92. DOI:10.15421/nvlvet8218
  14. Henson, F. (2020). An introduction to back pathology in the horse UK-Vet Equine Equine. Vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 112–115. DOI:10.12968/ukvet.2020.4.4.112
  15. Melnіkov, V.V., Rublenko, M.V., Storozhuk, V.A., Dudka, V.B. (2019). Osoblivostі reakcіi gostroi fazi ta ii korekcіya za hіrurgіchnoі patologіi u svinej [Peculiarities of the acute phase reaction and its correction during surgical pathology in pigs]. Naukovij vіsnik veterinarnoi medicini [Scientific Bulletin of Veterinary Medicine]. pp. 111–118. DOI:10.33245/2310-4902- 2019-149-1-111-118. (in Ukraine).
  16. Nojiria, A., Nishidoa, T., Horinakaa, O. (2015). Initial Clinical Application and Results of the Advanced Locking Plate System (ALPS) in Small Animal Orthopedics: Two Hundred Eighty Two Procedures. Intern J Appl Res Vet Med. Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 64–79.
  17. Raouf, M.A.E., Ezzeldein, S.A., Eisa, E.F.M. (2019). Bone fractures in dogs: A retrospective study of 129 dogs. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences. Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 401–405. Available at:www.vetmedmosul. com
  18. Raouf Abd, E.l.M., Mekkawy, N.H.M., AbdEl-Aal, A.M. (2015). Femur fractures and treatment options in 20 dogs admitted to our clinic from January 2013 to December 2015. Iraqi J Vet Sci. Vol. 31(2), pp. 117–122. DOI:10.33899/ ijvs.2017.145608.
  19. Pustovіt, R.V. (2007). Harakteristika perelomіv trubchastih kіstok u drіbnih domashnіh tvarin [Characteristics of fractures of tubular bones in small domestic animals]. Vіsnik Bіlocerkіv. derzh. agrar. un-tu. [Bulletin of Bila Tserkva State Agrarian University]. Issue 44, pp. 124–127. (in Ukraine)
  20. Libardoni, R.N., Serafini, G.M., Oliveira, C. Schimites, P. I. (2016). Appendicular fractures of traumatic etiology in dogs: 955 cases (2004-2013). Ciência Rural. Vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 45–58. DOI:10.1590/0103- 8478cr20150219
  21. Basha, M., Gopinathan, A., Naveen, K. (2019). Occurrence, classification, methods of fixation and outcome of long bone fractures in dogs: a review of 342 cases. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 284–291
  22. Giannoudis, P., Tzioupis, C., Almalki, T., Buckley, R. (2007). Fracture healing in osteoporotic fractures: Is it really different?: A basic science perspective. Injury. Vol. 38, Issue 1, Supplement, pp. 90–99. ISSN 0020-1383. DOI:10.1016/ j.injury.2007.02.014.
  23. Khomyn, N. M., Mysak, A. R., Dmytriiev, V. S. (2015). Monitorynh perelomiv kistok u sobak [Monitoring of bone fractures in dogs]. Naukovyi visnyk LNUVMBT imeni S.Z. Gzhytskoho [Scientific Bulletin of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S.Z. Gzhytskogo]. Vol. 17, no. 2 (62), pp. 259–264. (in Ukraine).
AttachmentSize
PDF icon chemerovskiy_1_2022.pdf506.26 KB