You are here

Potential risk in the organic poultry production and its prevention

The article provides general information on organic production, in order to obtain quality and safe poultry products that meet the requirements of current national, European and international legislation. Factors that may cause a risk in the production of organic food of animal origin are considered, taking into account the stages of primary production and specific requirements for keeping organic poultry, given the requirements for animal welfare. There have been identified biological, chemical and physical hazards that can reduce the profitability of production and affect the quality of poultry products, taking into account the peculiarities of organic livestock management and ensuring the welfare of animals in organic production. The given list of natural prophylactic drugs that can be used in organic livestock as an alternative to antimicrobial drugs, and demonstrated an example of prophylactic use in organic farming of young poultry, which resulted in increased poultry safety. It were compared certain parameters of the microclimate under conditions of intensive poultry farming vs poultry kept under the requirements of organic production. Microbiological air contaminations in poultry houses at industrial poultry farming system were exceeding the standard limits, when in organic poultry farming condition a significant reduction of the number of bacteria in the air was indicated. The list of national, European and international regulations governing the requirements for keeping poultry during organic production is given. It has been established the necessity of comprehensive approach for supporting the health of animals, their feeding and management, systematic monitoring of compliance with health and hygiene requirements of animals and poultry farming, products processing, obtaining high-quality, safe products to avoid risks in the chain for the successful development of the organic production.

Key words: organic production, poultry farming, hazards, risk analysis, microclimate, organic food, probiotics.

REFERENCES

1. Hens, L., Melnyk, L. H., Chygryn, O. Y., Dehtya-rova, I. B., Chmut, A. S. (2018). The Development of Green Technologies in the Agro-Industrial Complex: the EU Experience and the Prospects for Ukraine. Mechanism of Economic Regulation. no. 4, pp. 9–20.

2. Barański, M., Rempelos, L., Iversen, P. O., Leifert, C. (2017). Effects of organic food consumption on human health; the jury is still out!. Food & nutrition research. 61 (1), 1287333. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1080/16546628 .2017.1287333

3. Ostapenko, R., Herasymenko, Y., Nitsenko, V., Koliadenko, S., Balezentis, T., Streimikiene, D. (2020). Analysis of Production and Sales of Organic Products in Ukrainian Agricultural Enterprises. Sustainability. 12(8), 3416 p. Available at:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083416.

4. Vigar, V., Myers, S., Oliver, C., Arellano, J., Robin-son, S., Leifert, C. (2019). A Systematic Review of Organic Versus Conventional Food Consumption: Is There a Measurable Benefit on Human Health?. Nutrients. 12(1), 7 p. Available at:https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010007

5. Rizzi, C., Marangon, A. (2012). Quality of organic eggs of hybrid and Italian breed hens. Poultry science. 91(9), pp. 2330–2340.

6. Ozguven, N. (2012). Organic foods motivations factors for consumers. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 62: 661–665. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2012.09.110

7. Harper, G.C., Makatouni, A. (2002). "Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. British Food Journal. Vol. 104, no. 3/4/5, pp. 287–299. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700210425723

8. Novak, N.P. (2016). Principi ta konkurentnі perevagi rozvitku organіchnogo sіl's'kogospodars'kogo virobnictva v Ukraіnі [Priciples and competitive advantages development of organic agricultural production in Ukraine]. Agrosvіt. no. 9, pp. 30–33.

9. Pro osnovni pryncypy ta vymogy do organichnogo vyrobnyctva, obigu ta markuvannja organichnoi' produkcii': Zakon Ukrai'ny vid 10.07.2018 2496-VIII. Vidomosti Verhovnoi' Rady. 2018. № 36. st. 275. [On the Main Principles and Requirements towards Organic Production, Circulation and Labeling of Organic Products: Law of Ukraine of 10.07.2018 2496-VIII. Information of the Verkhovna Rada. 2018. № 36. P. 275].

10. Porjadok (detal'ni pravyla) organichnogo vyrobnyctva ta obigu organichnoi' produkcii', Zatverdzheni postanovoju Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrai'ny vid 23 zhovtnja 2019 r. № 970 – Oficijnyj visnyk Ukrai'ny vid 17.12.2019 – 2019 r., № 97, s. 22, stattja 3201, kod akta 96996/2019 / Oficijnyj sajt Verhovnoi' Rady Ukrai'ny. [Procedure (detailed rules) for organic production and circulation of organic products, Approved by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of October 23, 2019 № 970 - Offi cial Gazette of Ukraine of December 17, 2019 - 2019, № 97, p. 22, Article 3201, act code 96996/2019 / Official site of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine]. Available at: https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/970-2019-%D0%BF#n10

11. Perelik rechovyn (ingredijentiv, komponentiv), shho dozvoljajet'sja vykorystovuvaty u procesi organichnogo vyrobnyctva ta jaki dozvoleni do vykorystannja u granychno dopustymyh kil'kostjah Zatverdzheno Nakazom Ministerstva rozvytku ekonomiky, torgivli ta sil's'kogo gospodarstva Ukrai'ny 09 chervnja 2020 roku 1073, Zarejestrovano v Ministerstvi justycii' Ukrai'ny 07 serpnja 2020 r. za № 763/35046, Oficijnyj visnyk Ukrai'ny vid 21.08.2020 – 2020 r., 65, stor. 187, stattja 2109, kod akta 100388/2020/ Oficijnyj sajt Verhovnoi' Rady Ukrai'ny. [List of substances (ingredients, components) that are allowed to be used in the process of organic production and which are allowed to be used in maximum permitted quantities Approved by the Order of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Agriculture of Ukraine June 9, 2020 № 1073, Registered with the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine № 763/35046, Offi cial Gazette of Ukraine dated 21.08.2020 - 2020, № 65, p. 187, Article 2109, code of act 100388/2020 / Offi cial site of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.] Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ z0763-20#Text

12. European Council, 2007. Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC). No 2092/91. Available at:http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ.do?uri= OJ:L:2007:189:0001:0023:EN:PDF.

13. European Parliament and Council of the European Union 2018. Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018R0848

14. OIE - Terrestrial Animal Health Code (2019). Chapter 6.5. Biosecurity procedures in poultry production. 28/06/2019. Offi ce International des Epizooties, Paris Available at: https://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/ Health_standards/tahc/2018/en_chapitre_biosecu_poul_ production.htm

15. Codex Alimentarius Commission. (1999). Guidelines for the Production, Processing, Labelling and Marketing of Organically Produced Foods. CAC/GL 32-1999. Rome: FAO/WHO. Available at: http://www.fao.org/ DOCREP/005/Y2772E/Y2772E00.HTM

16. Malusá, E., Tartanus, M., Danelski, W. (2020). Monitoring of DDT in Agricultural Soils under Organic Farming in Poland and the Risk of Crop Contamination. Environmental Management. 66, pp. 916–929. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01347-9

17. EFSA European Food Safety Authority (2018) Monitoring data on pesticide residues in food: results on organic versus conventionally produced food. EFSA Supporting Publication 2018: EN-1397, Parma, Italy. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.en-1397

18. Dervilly-Pinel G. (2017). Micropollutants and chemical residues in organic and conventional meat, Food Chemistry. Vol. 232, pp. 218–228. Available at:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.013

19. Bain, C., Selfa, T. (2017). Non-GMO vs organic labels: purity or process guarantees in a GMO contaminated landscape. Agric Hum. Vol. 34, pp. 805–818. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9776-x

20. World Organization for Animal Health. (2016). The OIE strategy on antimicrobial resistance and the prudent use of antimicrobials. 12 p. Available at: https://www.oie.int/ fileadmin/Home/eng/Media_Center/docs/pdf/PortailAMR/ EN_OIE-AMRstrategy.pdf

21. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). (2018). Monitoring data on pesticide residues in food: results on organic versus conventionally produced food. EFSA Supporting Publications. 15 (4), 1397 p. Available at:https:// doi.org/10.2903/sp. efsa.2018.EN-1397

22. Cadena, M. (2018). Tetracycline and Sulfonamide Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Soils From Nebraska Organic Farming Operations. Front Microbiol. 28, 9, 1283 p. Available at:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01283.

23. Österberg, J. (2016). Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli from Pigs in Organic and Conventional Farming in Four European Countries. PLoS One. 11(6), e0157049. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157049.

24. Souillard, R. (2019). Husbandry Practices, Health, and Welfare Status of Organic Broilers in France. Animals (Basel). 9(3), 97 p. Available at:https://doi.org/10.3390/ ani9030097

25. Bracke, M.B.M. (2019). Broiler welfare trade-off: A semi-quantitative welfare assessment for optimised welfare improvement based on an expert survey. PLoS One. 14(10). e0222955. Available at:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0222955. PMID: 31574105; PMCID: PMC6772121.

26. Luttikholt, L.W.M. (2007). Principles of organic agriculture as formulated by the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements, NJAS. Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. Vol. 54, Issue 4, pp. 347–360. ISSN 1573-5214, Available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-5214(07)80008-X.

27. Young, I., Rajić, A., Wilhelm, B. J., Waddell, L., Parker, S., & McEwen, S. A. (2009). Comparison of the prevalence of bacterial enteropathogens, potentially zoonotic bacteria and bacterial resistance to antimicrobials in organic and conventional poultry, swine and beef production: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology and Infection. 137(9), pp. 1217–1232.

28. FOAM. The IFOAM Norms for Organic Production and Processing, Version 2014. IFOAM; Bonn, Germany: 2014. [(accessed on 8 January 2020)]. Available at: https://www. ifoam.bio/sites/default/files/ifoam_norms_july_2014_t.pdf.

29. DSTU ISO 6887-1:2003 Mikrobiologija harchovyh produktiv i kormiv dlja tvaryn. Gotuvannja doslidzhuvanyh prob, vyhidnoi' suspenzii' ta desjatykratnyh rozveden' dlja mikrobiologichnogo doslidzhennja. Chastyna 1. Zagal'ni pravyla gotuvannja vyhidnoi' suspenzii' ta desjatykratnyh rozveden'[Chynnyj vid 2004-01-10]. Kyi'v : Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrai'ny, 2004. IV, 10 s. [Microbiology of food and animal feed. Preparation of test samples, initial suspension and ten-fold dilutions for microbiological examination. Part 1. General rules for preparation of the initial suspension and ten-fold dilutions [Effective from 2004-01-10]. Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrainy, 2004. IV, 10 p.] (ISO 6887-1:1999, IDT).

30. DSTU ISO 6888-1:2003 Mikrobiologija harchovyh produktiv i kormiv dlja tvaryn. Goryzontal'nyj metod pidrahuvannja koagulazopozytyvnyh stafilokokiv (Staphylococcus aureus ta inshyh vydiv). Chastyna 1. Metod z vykorystannjam agarovogo seredovyshha Beard-Parkera [Chynnyj vid 2004-01-10]. Kyi'v: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrai'ny, 2004. [Microbiology of food and animal feed. Horizontal method of counting coagulase-positive staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other species). Part 1. Method using agar medium Beard-Parker [Effective from 2004-01-10]. Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrainy, 2004.] (ISO 6888-1:1999, IDT).

31. DSTU ISO 15214:2007 Mikrobiologija harchovyh produktiv i kormiv dlja tvaryn. Goryzontal'nyj metod pidrahuvannja mezofil'nyh molochnokyslyh bakterij za temperatury 30°S [Chynnyj vid 2009-01-01]. Kyi'v: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrai'ny, 2008. IV, 6 s. [Microbiology of food and animal feed. Horizontal method of counting mesophilic lactic acid bacteria at a temperature of 30 ° C [Effective from 2009-01-01]. Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrainy, 2008. IV, 6 p. (ISO 15214:1998, IDT).

32. Metodicheskie ukazanija 4.2.2723-10 Laboratornaja diagnostika sal'monellezov, obnaruzhenie sal'monell v pishhevyh produktah i ob#ektah okruzhajushhej sredy [Methodical instructions 4.2.2723-10 Laboratory diagnostics of salmonellosis, detection of salmonella in food and environmental objects]. 2010. Available at: http://docs.cntd. ru/document/1200083950

33. Simons, R. R., Horigan, V. Ip. S., Taylor, R. A., Crescio, M. I., Maurella, C. (2019). A spatial risk assessment model framework for incursion of exotic animal disease into the European Union Member States. Microb Risk Anal. 13 p. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. mran.2019.05.001

34. Prioritising exotic livestock diseases for Europe. Available at: https://spare-europe.shinyapps.io/Prioritising_ livestock_diseases/

35. Willer, H., Lernoud, J. (2019). The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2019 . Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL and IFOAM Organics International. pp. 331–336.

36. Reithmayer, C., Mußhoff, O. (2019). Consumer preferences for alternatives to chick culling in Germany. Poult Sci. 98(10), pp. 4539–4548. Available at: https://doi. org/10.3382/ps/pez272.

37. Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes - OJ L 221, 8.8.1998, pp. 23–27 Available at: https://eur-lex.europa. eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31998L0058

38. Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens OJ L 203. 3.8, 1999, pp. 53–57. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A3199 9L0074&qid=1606737329095

39. Council Directive 2007/43/EC of 28 June 2007 laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production (Text with EEA relevance) OJ L. 2007, 182, 12.7, pp. 19–28. Available at: https://eur-lex. europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32007L 0043&qid=1606737428408

40. Pro derzhavnyj kontrol' za dotrymannjam zakonodavstva pro harchovi produkty, kormy, pobichni produkty tvarynnogo pohodzhennja, zdorov’ja ta blagopoluchchja tvaryn: Zakon Ukrai'ny VR № 2042-19, [Chynnyj z 04.04.2018r.]. Vidomosti Verhovnoi' Rady. 2017. № 31. st. 343. [On state control that is carried out in order to verify compliance with the legislation on food and feed, health and welfare of animals: Law of Ukraine VR № 2042-19, valid from 04.04.2018 Information of the Verkhovna Rada. 2017. № 31. P.343].

41. Garkavenko T. O., Azyrkina I. M. Normatyvno-zakonodavchi vymogy shhodo vyznachennja zalyshkovyh kil'kostej antymikrobnyh preparativ u produkcii' ptahivnyctva. Veterynarna biotehnologija. 2015. (27). C. 96-104.

42. Murphy D., Ricci A., Auce Z., Beechinor J. G., Bergendahl H., Hekman P. (2017). EMA Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) and EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). EMA and EFSA Joint Scientific Opinion on measures to reduce the need to use antimicrobial agents in animal husbandry in the European Union, and the resulting impacts on food safety (RONAFA). EFSA Journal. 15(1), e04666. Available at:https://doi. org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4666

43. CDC. (2017). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Campylobacter, Salmonella led bacterial foodborne illnesses in 2016. Retrieved October 2017. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/ p0420-campylobacter-salmonella.html

44. EFSA and ECDC (European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control), 2019. The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report. EFSA Journal. 2019, 17 (12), 5926, 276 p. Available at:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5926

45. Painter, J.A., Hoekstra, R.M., Ayers, T., Tauxe, R.V., Braden, C.R., Angulo, F.J. (2013). Attribution of foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths to food commodities by using outbreak data, United States, 1998–2008. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 19(3), pp. 407–415. Available at:http:// dx.doi.org/10.3201/ eid1903.111866

46. Pro osnovnі principi ta vimogi do bezpechnostі ta jakostі harchovih produktіv: Zakon Ukrai'ny vіd 23.12.1997. № 771/97-VR. Redakcіja vіd 16.01.2020. [On basic principles and requirements for food products safety and quality: Law of Ukraine from 23.12.1997. 771/97-VR, Edited on 16.01.2020]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov. ua/laws/show/771/97-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text

47. RASFF Portal. Available at: https://webgate. ec.europa.eu/rasff-window/portal/

48. Alali, W.Q., Thakur, S., Berghaus, R.D., Martin, M.P., Gebreyes, W.A. (2010). Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 7(11), pp. 1363–1371. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2010.0566

49. Biswas, D., Micallef, S. (2019). Safety and Practice for Organic Food. 1st Edition. Academic Press. 418 р.

50. Alvarez-Olmos, M.I. (2001). Probiotic agents and infection diseases: a modern perspective on a tradition therapy.Clin. Infect. Dis. Vol. 2, 11, pp. 1567–1576. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/320518

51. Ammoscato, F., Scirocco, A., Altomare, A. (2013). Lactobacillus rhamnosus protects human colonic muscle from pathogen lipopolysaccharide-induced damage. Neurogastroenterol Motil. Vol. 25, 984 p. e777. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12232

52. Cicenia, A., Scirocco, A., Carabotti, M., Pallotta, L., Marignani, M., Severi, C. (2014). Postbiotic activities of lactobacilli-derived factors. Journal of clinical gastroenterology. 48, 1, pp. 18–22. Available at:https://doi. org/10.1097/MCG.0000 000000000231

AttachmentSize
PDF icon vetvisnik_-2-2020-028-038.pdf809.66 KB