You are here

Prevalence of rectal prolapse in piglets in the presence of mycotoxins in mash

Rectal prolapse in piglets and sows is quite common inindustrial farms. This pathology is most common among pigsaged 77-98 days (36.4%). According to the literature, there isa number of different factors that are considered causal, butthe pathogenesis of rectal prolapse in piglets for fattening hasnot been fully established. Regarding this at the enterprisePE Agricultural Firm"Svitanok" a study of hybrid DYLpiglets, aged 78-125 days, with rectal prolapse, receivingpigs’ complete feed PCF-4 (Grower) was conducted, inwhich mycotoxins were detected in small quantities. In thisregard, the adsorbent INTox (manufactured by Novakorm) inthe amount of 2 kg per ton of compound feed was used.Itwas found that rectal prolapse in Agricultural Firm Svitanokwas observed in piglets of 2-6 months age in 0.4% of thetotal population, more often in spring (0.23% of piglets), thelowest number of cases was registered in summer (0.03%),gender,cough and diarrhea did not affect this pathologyprogress. The study was performed on two groups of piglets,one was fed with sorbent-free compound feed and the otherwith compound feed with the sorbent added. Piglets were keptin groups of 30 heads. Watering and feeding of animals wasprovided by a fully automated system of drinking troughs andfeeders, which met animals' needs for food and water aroundthe clock. The experiment lasted for 47 days. At the end ofthe experiment the number of cases of rectal prolapse wasanalyzed, clinical examination of animals and examinationof animal serum for mycotoxins were performed. Bloodsamples were taken from the cranial vena cava, bloodserum was obtained by the method of centrifugation. Thepresence of zearalenone, α-zearalenone, β-zearalenone, DON(deoxyvalenone, vomitoxin), aflatoxin B was determined inthe blood serum.In the study of pig serum for the presenceof mycotoxins (with and without the use of adsorbent) it wasfound that all serum samples do not contain deoxyvalene, andthe content of aflotoxin B1, zearalenone and α-zearalenonedoes not exceed normal. However, in the absence of adsorbentin the feed an increased concentration of β-zearalenone wasfound, which ranges from 3.98 to 5.28 nanogram per milliliter,i.e.it exceeds the value of the norm in all cases (up to 3.0nanogram per milliliter). With the use of adsorbent, whichwas added, the concentration of β-zearalenone in the serumof animals was within normal limits, and the percentage ofpiglets with rectal prolapse decreased from 0.85 to 0.45%.

Key words: pigs, intoxication, β-zearalenone, INToxadsorbent, prolapse, bloodserum.

 

  1. Grudzień, W., Szarek, J., Dzikowski, A., Babińska, I.,Sołtyszewski, I. (2018). Rectalprolapse (prolapsusrecti) in swineas a still open problem. Publisher uwm olsztyn. Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 341–348. ref.31. Available at:uwm.edu.pl/polish-journal/sites/default/files/issues/articles/11-grudzien_dziko wski.pdf
  2. Luchahyn, E.A., Borysov, Y.V., Khon, F.K. (2020).Hirurgicheskaja pomoshh' pri vypadenii prjamoj kishkiu porosjat [Surgical care for rectal prolapse in piglets].Dostizhenija i perspektivy nauchno-innovacionnogorazvitija APK [Achievements and prospects of scientific and innovative development of the agroindustrial complex].pp. 499–502. Available at:www.elibrary.ru/download/ elibrary_43058586_98836495.pdf
  3. Smahulova, Z. A., Tokareva, E. A. (2016).Prolapspriamoikyshky u porosiat [Rectal prolapse in piglets].Elektronnuy nauchnui hurnal [Electronic scientific journal]. no. 12–1, pp. 66–68. Available at:www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_27664401_10342996.pdf
  4. Yliasov, B. K., Shatmanov, K. K., Nurdylda, A. Sh.(2016). Jetiologija i operativnoe lechenie vypadenijaprjamoj kishki u svinej [Etiology and surgical treatmentof rectal prolapse in pigs]. Nauchnue trudu Yu KHU ym.M. Auezova [Scientific works of SKSU them. M. Auezova].no. 2(37), pp. 100–101. Available at:www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_42212605_64030434.pdf5.
  5. Gardner, I., Hird, D. W., Franti, C. E., Glenn, J.(1988). Patterns and determinants of rectal prolapse in a herdof pigs. The Veterinary record. Vol. 123(9), pp. 222–225. DOI:10.1136/vr.123.9.222
  6. Paboeuf, F., Martineau, G.P., Morin, N., Keranflec'h, A.,Cariolet, R. (2014). Determinants of rectal prolapse inSpecific Pathogen Free piglets [Conference poster]. Journéesde la Recherche Porcine en France. Vol. 46, pp. 171–172. Available at:www.journees-recherche-porcine.com/texte/2014/sante/ 7SP2.pdf
  7. Contreras-Aguilar, M. D., Escribano, D., MartínezMiró, S., López-Arjona, M., Rubio, C. P., Martínez-Subiela, S.,Tecles, F. (2019). Application of a score for evaluationof pain, distress and discomfort in pigs with lameness andprolapses: correlation with saliva biomarkers and severityof the disease. Research in veterinary science. Vol. 126, pp.155–163. DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2019. 08.004
  8. Usenko, V. V., Lytvynov, R. D., Luhovaia, A. V.(2018). Problema prolapsa prjamoj kishki u molodnjaka svinejAO" Agroholding" Kuban" [The problem of rectal prolapsein young pigs of JSC "Agroholding" Kuban "]. Puti realizaciiFederal'noj nauchno-tehnicheskoj programmy razvitijasel'skogo hozjajstva na 2017-2025 gody [Ways to implement the Federal scientific and technical program of agricultural development for 2017-2025.]. pp. 725–728. Available at:www. elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_34910743_75307900.pdf
  9. Tkaczyk, A., Jedziniak, P. (2021). Mycotoxin Biomarkers in Pigs-Current State of Knowledge and Analytics. Toxins. Vol. 13, no. 8, 586 p. DOI:10.3390/toxins13080586
  10. Khoshal, A. K. (2019). Co-occurrence of DON andemerging mycotoxins in worldwide finished pig feed andtheir combined toxicity in intestinal cells. Toxins. Vol. 11, no.12, 727 p. DOI:10.3390/toxins11120727
  11. Dvorskaya, Y.U. (2008). Mikotoksiny opasny dlyasviney [Mycotoxins are dangerous for pigs]. Tvarinnitstvo Ukrainu [Livestock of Ukraine]. no. 5, pp. 14–15. Available at:ir.znau.edu.ua/ bitstream/123456789/5798/1/VXDZA_2010_ 21_1_ 276-282.pdf
  12. Neme, K., Mohammed, A. (2017). Mycotoxinoccurrence in grains and the role of postharvest managementas a mitigation strategies. A review. Food Control. Vol. 78, pp. 412–425. DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.03.012
  13. Hlazunova, L. A., Maliuk, L. E., Hlazunov, Yu. V.(2017). Monitoring soderzhanija toksina zearalenon v kormahdlja svinej [Monitoring the content of zearalenone toxin infeed for pigs]. Sovremennye nauchno-prakticheskie reshenijav APK [Modern scientific and practical solutions in the agroindustrial complex]. pp. 202–208. Available at:www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_ 32527619_83804452.pdf
  14. Agag, B. I. (2004). Mycotoxins in foods and feeds:1-aflatoxins. Ass. Univ. Bull. Environ. Res. Vol. 7, no. 1,pp. 173–205. Article  DOI:10.21608/auber.2004.150623
  15. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). ScientificOpinion on the risks for human and animal health related to the presence of modified forms of certain mycotoxins in foodand feed. EFSA J. 2014, Vol. 12, 3916 p. DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3916
  16. Patience, J. F., Gould, S., Acosta, J. Patience, J. F.,Gould, S., Acosta, J. (2019). Just how much mycotoxincan a pig handle? National Hog Farmer. 1–4 pp.Available at:lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/view content.cgi?article=1772&context=ans_pubs
  17. Schelstraete, W., Devreese, M., Croubels, S. (2020).Comparative toxicokinetics of Fusarium mycotoxins inpigs and humans. Food and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 137, 111140 p. DOI:10.1016/j. fct.2020.111140
  18. Bryden, W.L. (2012). Mycotoxin contamination ofthe feed supply chain: Implications for animal productivityand feed security. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. Vol. 173, pp.134–158. DOI:10.1016/j. anifeedsci.2011.12.014
  19. Levchenko, V.I., Zaiarniuk, V.P., Papchenko, I.V.(2005). Hvoroby svynej: navch. posib. dlja agrar. vyshh.navch. zakl. [Ailments of pigs: a master's guide for agrarianhousehold pawns]. Bila Tserkva, 167 p. Available at:rep.btsau.edu.ua/bitstream/BNAU/512/1/Hvoroby_svynej.pdf
  20. Kibkalo, D. V., Vikulina, H. V., Borovkova, V. M.,Borovkov, S. B., Onyshchenko, O. V. (2015). Porivnialnaotsinka iznykh metodiv v ziattia krovi u svynei [Comparativeevaluation of different methods of blood collection inpigs]. Problemy zooinzhenerii ta veterynarnoi medytsyny[Problems of zooengineering and veterinary medicine]. Issue31, Part 2, pp. 16–20. Available at:repository. hdzva.edu.ua/bitstream/repoHDZVA/56/1/Kibkalo_blood_selection.pdf
  21. Levchenko, V.I., Vlizlo, Y.Y., Kondrakhin, I.P.,(2002). Veterynarna klinichna biokhimiia [Clinicalbiochemistry]. Bila Tserkva, 400 p. Available at:rep.btsau.edu.ua/bitstream/BNAU/442/ 1/Veterynarna_klinichna_biohimija_pidruchnyk.pdf
  22. Perfumo, C.J. (2002). Constrictura rectalencerdosnecropsiadosen una granja de ciclo complete enconfinamiento. Consideraciones sobre su prevalencia,hallazgos anatomopatológicos y etiopatogenia. Archivosde medicina veterinaria. Vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 245–252. DOI:10.4067/S0301-732X200 2000200010.
  23. Gambacorta, L., Olsen, M., Solfrizzo, M. (2019).Pig urinary concentration of mycotoxins and metabolites reflects regional differences, mycotoxin intake and feed contaminations. Toxins. Vol. 11, no. 7, 378 p. DOI:10.3390/toxins11070378
AttachmentSize
PDF icon boyko_2_2021.pdf439.26 KB