You are here

Use of the probiotic feed supplement “Subtiform” in feeding puppies

Usually, antibiotic resistance of microorganisms occurs as a result of long-term treatment and prophylactic use of antibiotics. Environmental exposure to puppies’ food base also contributes to the development of antibiotic resistance. It is imperative to investigate the sensitivity of cultures to antibiotics during isolation in order to determine their resistance and provide recommendations for the use of specific drugs. The purpose of the study was to determine the sensitivity of E. coli to antibiotics, as well as the overall bacteriological contamination in the fecal samples of two experimental groups of puppies treated with the probiotic preparation in their main diet. To achieve the goal, generally accepted clinical, microbiological and bacteriological research methods were used, in particular, the disco-diffuse method using standardized antibiotic discs manufactured by ASPECT LLC (Ukraine) to assess antibiotic resistance to antibiotic resistance on the Müller-Hintot medium using API-20E-strips (bioMerieux, France) according to the Kibri-Bauer method (disco-diffuse method). In a study of the probiotic effect on the intestinal microflora of puppies, it was found that the use of a probiotic had a significant effect on bacterial contamination of fecal samples of experimental groups of puppies. E. coli cultures were tested for sensitivity to 7 antibiotics. Due to the size of the zones of growth retardation of microorganisms, it was possible to determine the sensitivity of the culture to each antibiotic. The results of the study show that the cultures were extremely sensitive to azithromycin as well as nitrofurantoin and chloramphenicol (according to EUCAST standards). The addition of probiotic symbiotic preparations Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis to the diet of dogs improved the intestinal microflora in 71.42% of combinations of conditions and antibacterial substance.

Keywords: resistance, Escherichia coli, bacterial susceptibility, bacterial contamination, antibiotics, probiotic, dogs.

  1. Salam, M.A., Al-Amin, M.Y., Salam, M.T. (2023). Antimicrobial Resistance: A Growing Serious Threat for Global Public Health. Healthcare. 11 (13), 1946 p. DOI:10.3390/healthcare11131946
  2. Saha, M., Sarkar, A. (2021). Review on Multiple Facets of Drug Resistance: A Rising Challenge in the 21st Century. J. Xenobiotics, 11, pp. 197–214. DOI:10.3390/jox11040013
  3. Shkromada, O.I., Fotina, T.I., Fotina, G.A. (2022). Vplyv Bacillus subtilis na porosjat pry vidluchenni [The effect of Bacillus subtilis on pig lets at weaning]. Visnyk Sums'kogo nacional'nogo agrarnogo universytetu [Bulletin of the Sumy National Agrarian University], 1 (56), pp. 51–57. DOI:10.32845/bsnau.vet.2022.1 (in Ukrainian).
  4. Parmanik, A., Das, S., Kar, B. (2022). Cur rent Treatment Strategies Against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: A Review. Curr. Microbiol. 79, 388 p. DOI:10.1007/s00284-022-03061-7
  5. Zhu, Y., Huang, W.E., Yang, Q. (2022). Clinical perspective of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria. Infect. Drug Resist. 15, pp. 735–746. DOI:10.2147/IDR.S345574
  6. Brives, C., Pourraz, J. (2020). Phage therapy as a potential solution in the fight against AMR: Obstacles and possible futures. Palgrave Commun. 6, 100 p. DOI:10.1057/s41599-020-0478-4
  7. WHO Regional Office for Europe & European Center for Disease Prevention and Control. (2023‎). Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe, 2022 data: executive summary. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Available at:https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/374172
  8. Molina, R.A., Villar, M.D., Miranda, M.H. (2023). A multi-strain probiotic promoted recovery of puppies from gastroenteritis in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Can Vet J., 64 (7), pp. 666–673. PMID: 37397694
  9. Van, Camp P.J., Haslam, D.B., Porollo, A. (2020). Prediction of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacteria from whole-genome sequencing data. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1013 p. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01013
  10. Tian, Zh., Wang, X., Duan, Y. (2021). Dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis promotes the growth and gut health of weaned piglets. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 7. DOI:10.3389/fvets.2020.600772
  11. EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing method summary. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Available at:www.eucast.org
  12. Uddin, T.M., Chakraborty, A.J., Khusro, A. (2021). Antibiotic resistance in microbes: History, mechanisms, therapeutic strategies and future prospects. J. Infect. Public Health., 14, pp. 1750–1766. DOI:10.1016/j.jiph.2021.10.020
  13. Bohatko, A.F. (2023). Effect of probiotic supplement SUBTIFORM on welfare and performance of broiler chickens: collection of materials of conferences on veterinary medicine, Scientific and Methodological Center of VFPO. Kyiv, pp. 74–80. Available at:http://rep.btsau.edu.ua/handle/BNAU/9263
  14. Zhou, L., Abouelezz, K., Momenah, M.A. (2023). Dietary Paenibacillus polymyxa AM20 as a new probiotic: Improving effects on IR broiler growth performance, hepatosomatic index, thyroid hormones, lipid profile, immune response, antioxidant parameters, and caecal microorganisms. Poultry Sciences, 103 (2), 103239 p. DOI:10.1016/j.psj.2023.103239.
  15. Hasan, A., Qazi, J., Muzaffer, N. (2022). Effect of organic acids and probiotics on growth of Apis mellifera Workers. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 54 (6), pp. 2577–2583. DOI:10.17582/journal.pjz/20210803100802
  16. Garkavenko, T.O., Nevolmo, O.M., Kozytska, T.G. (2015). Metodychni rekomendacii' «Vyznachennja chutlyvosti mikroorganizmiv do antybakterial'nyh preparativ» [Methodological recommendations “Determination of the sensitivity of microorganisms to antibacterial drugs”]. Kyiv: DNDILDVSE. (in Ukrainian).
  17. ISO 30518-972006. Harchovi produkty. Metody vyjavlennja ta vyznachennja chysel'nosti bakterij koliformnoi' grupy (Coliform bacteria) [ISO 30518-972006. Food products. Methods for detecting and determining the number of coliform bacteria (Coliform bacteria)]. Kyiv: DSTU of Ukraine, 2001. (in Ukrainian).
  18. DSTU 8680:2016. Nacional'nyj standart Ukrai'ny. Nakaz № 238 «Pro pryjnjattja nacional'nyh normatyvnyh dokumentiv Ukrai'ny ta vnesennja zmin do nacional'nogo standartu». (serpen' 2016 roku) [DSTU 8680:2016. National standard of Ukraine. Order No. 238 “On adoption of national regulatory documents of Ukraine and amendments to the national standard.” (August 2016)]. Available at:http://www.ukrndnc.org.ua (in Ukrainian).
  19. DSTU 8534:2015. Nacional'nyj standart Ukrai'ny. Harchovi produkty. Metod vyjavlennja i vyznachennja chysel'nosti enterokokiv [DSTU 8534:2015. National Standard of Ukraine. Food products. Method for detection and determination of the number of enterococci]. Kyiv: UkrNDNTS, 2016. Available at:http://www.ukrndnc.org.ua (in Ukrainian).
  20. Nunan, C. (2017). Antibiotic use in farm animals. In The Meat Crisis. London: Routledge, pp. 228–239. DOI:10.4324/9781315562032-14
  21. Reznikov, O.G. (2003). Zagal'ni etychni pryncypy eksperymentiv na tvarynah [General ethical principles of animal experiments]. Pershyj Nacional'nyj kongres z bioetyky [First National Congress on Bioethics]. Endokrynologija [Endocrinology], 8 (1), pp. 142–145. Available at:https://endokrynologia.com.ua/index.php/journal/issue/view/59/65 (in Ukrainian).
  22. Pentylyuk, S.I. (2006). Suchasni kormovi biopreparaty [Modern feed biological products]. Tvarynnyctvo Ukrai'ny [Livestock breeding of Ukraine]. 6, pp. 25–27. (in Ukrainian).
  23. Gutsol, A.V., Dmytruk, I.V., Dmytruk, L.I. (2023). Produktyvnist' molodnjaku svynej pry vykorystanni probiotychnyh preparativ u skladi granul'ovanogo kombikormu [Productivity of young pigs when using probiotic preparations in the composition of granulated feed]. Kormy ta kormovyrobnyctvo [Feed and feed production]. 96, pp. 172–179. DOI:10.31073/kormovyrobnytstvo202396-1611 (in Ukrainian).
  24. Yue, S., Li, Z., Hu, F., Picimbon, J.F. (2020). Curing piglets from diarrhea and preparation of a healthy microbiome with Bacillus treatment for industrial animal breeding. Scientific reports. 10 (1), 19476 p. DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-75207-1
  25. WHO. Global Action Plan on Antibiotic Resistance. Available at:https://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/drug-resistance/global-action-pla...
  26. Markowiak, P., Śliżewska, K. (2017). Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients. 9 (9), 1021 p. DOI:10.3390/nu9091021
  27. Han, B., Liang, S., Sun, J. (2024). The Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum on the Fecal Microbiota, Short Chain Fatty Acids, Odorous Substances, and Blood Biochemical Indices of Cats. Microorganisms. 12 (1), 91 p. DOI:10.3390/microorganisms12010091.
AttachmentSize
PDF icon sokolenko_2_2025_.pdf626.97 KB