You are here

Safety of quail meat after drinking Chlorella suspension

Green algae Chlorella is positioned as a biologically active feed additive that includes proteins, polysaccharides, vitamins, minerals, glycoproteins and ß-glucans. Adding a small amount of them to the diet has a positive effect on the health and welfare of animals and poultry. However, their use in poultry farming requires an analysis of the quality and safety of the obtained products for the consumer. The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and quality of quail meat after drinking a suspension of Chlorella vulgaris microalgae. The object of study were quails of the Pharaoh breed, at the age of one day they were divided into two groups: experimental and control, 30 heads in each. The birds were kept in cages with free access to food and water. The quails of the research group were given a chlorella suspension (DSTU EK ISO 8692:2022 EN) in their drinking water. For drinking, the prepared chlorella suspension was diluted with drinking water to a concentration of 2*106 cells/ml grown in a glass fermenter. Weighing of quails was carried out weekly starting from day-old age. Drinking the suspension of Chlorella vulgaris increased the live weight of quail by 13.2 (p<0.05) compared to the control. Pre-slaughter examination of quails of both groups revealed a satisfactory clinical condition of the bird. An examination of 20 quail carcasses showed that they can be attributed to the first grade. According to organoleptic indicators, quail meat in the veterinary and sanitary sense belongs to benign quality. The conducted microbiological studies of quail meat show that there is no effect of the microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana in the applied doses on its bacterial contamination. The chemical parameters of the meat (pH, amino ammonia nitrogen, volatile fatty acids) during storage in the refrigerator (5 days, t= 4–5 °C) tended to increase and were within the normal range for a fresh product. During microscopy, m ulcer tissue and its disintegration were not detected in quails of both groups. The biological value of quail meat of both groups was identical, and there was no toxicity. The tasting evaluation of the broth and meat showed that drinking the microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana does not affect the studied taste indicators. Therefore, the meat of quails that received the microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana feed additive with water is of good quality according to the veterinary and sanitary examination, which allows it to be used for human consumption without restrictions. Key words: poultry, microalgae, organoleptic evaluation, microbial contamination, biological value, tasting evaluation.> <0.05) compared to the control. Pre-slaughter examination of quails of both groups revealed a satisfactory clinical condition of the bird. An examination of 20 quail carcasses showed that they can be attributed to the first grade. According to organoleptic indicators, quail meat in the veterinary and sanitary sense belongs to benign quality. The conducted microbiological studies of quail meat show that there is no effect of the microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana in the applied doses on its bacterial contamination. The chemical parameters of the meat (pH, amino ammonia nitrogen, volatile fatty acids) during storage in the refrigerator (5 days, t= 4–5 °C) tended to increase and were within the normal range for a fresh product. During microscopy, mulcer tissue and its disintegration were not detected in quails of both groups. The biological value of quail meat of both groups was identical, and there was no toxicity. The tasting evaluation of the broth and meat showed that drinking the microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana does not affect the studied taste indicators. Therefore, the meat of quails that received the microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana feed additive with water is of good quality according to the veterinary and sanitary examination, which allows it to be used for human consumption without restrictions.

Key words: poultry, microalgae, organoleptic evaluation, microbial contamination, biological value, tasting evaluation.

  1. Camacho, F., Macedo, A., Malcata, F. (2019). Potential industrial applications and commercialization of microalgae in the functional food and feed industries: a short review. Mar Drugs. Vol. 17 (6), 312 p. DOI:10.3390/md17060312
  2. Andrade, L.M., Andrade, C.J., Dias, M., Nascimento,C.A.O., Mendes, M.A. (2018). Chlorella and spirulina microalgae as sources of functional foods, nutraceuticals, and food supplements; an overview. MOJ Food Process Technol. Vol. 6 (1), pp. 45–58. DOI:10.15406/mojfpt. 2018.06.00144
  3. Valente, L.M.P., Cabrita, A.R.J., Maia, M.R.G., Valente, I.M., Engrola, S., Fonseca, A.J.M. (2021) Microalgae as feed ingredients for livestock production and aquaculture. Microalgae. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp. 239–312.
  4. Araújo, R., Calderón, F., López, J., Azevedo, I., Bruhn, A., Fluch, S. (2021). Current status of the algae production industry in Europe: an emerging sector of the blue bioeconomy. Front Mar Sci. Vol. 7:626389. DOI:10.3389/fmars.2020.626389
  5. Tibbetts, S.M. (2018). The potential for ‘next-generation’, microalgae-based feed ingredients for salmonid aquaculture in context of the blue revolution. Microalgal Biotechnology. DOI:10.5772/intechopen.73551
  6. Villarruel-López, A., Ascencio, F., Nuño, K. (2017). Microalgae, a potential natural functional food source – a review. Pol J Food Nutr Sci., Vol. 67 (4), pp. 251–263. DOI:10.1515/pjfns-2017-0017
  7. Costa, M.M., Spínola, M.P., Prates, J.A.M. (2024). Microalgae as an Alternative Mineral Source in Poultry Nutrition. Vet Sci. Vol. 20, 11 (1), 44 p. DOI:10.3390/vetsci11010044
  8. Patel, A.K., Singhania, R.R., Awasthi, M.K., Varjani, S., Bhatia, S.K., Tsai, M.L., Hsieh, S.L., Chen, C.W., Dong, C.D. (2021). Emerging prospects of macro- and microalgae as prebiotic. Microb Cell Fact. Vol. 5, 20 (1), 112 p. DOI:10.1186/s12934-021-01601-7
  9. Yan, L., Kim, I.H. (2013). Effects of dietary ω-3 fatty acid-enriched microalgae supplementation on growth performance, blood profles, meat quality, and fatty acid composition of meat in broilers. J. Appl. Anim. Res., Vol. 41, pp. 392–397. DOI:10.1080/09712 119.2013.787361
  10. Madeira, M.S., Cardoso, C., Lopes, P.A., Coelho, D., Afonso, C., Bandarra, N.M., Prates, J.A.M. (2017). Microalgae as feed ingredients for livestock production and meat quality: a review. Livest. Sci. Vol. 205, pp. 111–121. DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2017.09.020
  11. De Jesus Raposo, M.F., De Morais, A.M.M.B., De Morais, R.M.S.C. (2016). Emergent sources of prebiotics: Seaweeds and microalgae. Mar. Drugs. Vol. 14, 27 p. DOI:10.3390/md 14020027
  12. Kotrbáček, V., Doubek, J., Doucha, J. (2015). The chlorococcalean alga chlorella in animal nutrition: a review. J. Appl. Phycol, Vol. 27, pp. 2173–2180. DOI:10.1007/s10811-014-0516-y
  13. Abdeen, A., Elsabagh, R., Elbasuni, S.S., Said, A.M., Abdelkader, A., El-Far, A.H., Ibrahim, S.F., Mihaela, O., Fericean, L., Abdelfattah, A.M., El-He- waity, M., Elbarbary, N., Kadah, A.Y., Ibrahim, S.S. (2023). Microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris) attenuates aflatoxin-associated renal injury. Front Pharmacol. Vol. 14:1291965. DOI:10.3389/fphar.2023.1291965. PMID: 38205372; PMCID: PMC10777483.
  14. Saadaoui, I., Rasheed, R., Aguilar, A., Cherif, M., Al Jabri, H., Sayadi, S., Manning, S.R. (2021). Microalgal-based feed: promising alternative feedstocks for livestock and poultry production. J Anim Sci Biotechnol, Vol. 12 (1), 76 p. DOI:10.1186/s40104- 021-00593-z
  15. Barkia, I., Saari, N., Manning, S.R. (2019). Microalgae for high-value products towards human health and nutrition. Mar Drugs. Vol. 17 (5), 304 p. DOI:10.3390/md17050304
  16. Heussner, A.H., Mazija, L., Fastner, J., Dietrich, D.R. (2012). Toxin content and cytotoxicity of algal dietary supplements. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. Vol. 265 (2), pp. 263–271. DOI:10.1016/j.taap.2012.10.005
  17. Henao, E., Murphy, P.J., Falfushynska, H., Horyn, O., Evans, D.M., Klimaszyk, P., Rzymski, P. (2020). Polymethoxy-1-alkenes screening of chlorella and spirulina food supplements coupled with in vivo toxicity studies. Toxins (Basel). Vol. 12 (2), 111 p. DOI:10.3390/toxins12020111
  18. Yim, H.E., Yoo, K.H., Seo, W.H., Won, N.H., Hong, Y.S., Lee, J.W. (2007). Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis following ingestion of Chlorella tablets. Pediatr Nephrol. Vol. 22 (6), pp. 887–888. DOI:10.1007/ s00467-006-0420-z
  19. Görs, M., Schumann, R., Hepperle, D., Karsten, U. (2010). Quality analysis of commercial chlorella products used as dietary supplement in human nutrition. J. Appl. Phycol., Vol. 22, pp. 265–276. DOI:10.1007/s10811-009-9455-4
  20. Muys, M., Sui, Y., Schwaiger, B., Lesueur, C., Vandenheuve, D., Vermeir, P., Vlaeminck, S.E. (2019). High Variability in Nutritional Value and Safety of Commercially Available Chlorella and Spirulina Biomass Indicates the Need for Smart Production Strategies. Bioresour. Technol. Vol. 275, pp. 247–257. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.059
  21. Bogatko, N.M. (2020). Sanitarno-gigijenichnyj stan holodyl'nyh kamer ta ob’jektiv za zberigannja m’jasa zabijnyh tvaryn na potuzhnostjah z i'h vyrobnyctva ta obigu [Sanitary and hygienic condition of refrigerating chambers and facilities for storing meat of slaughtered animals at facilities for their production and circulation]. Naukovyj visnyk L'vivs'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu veterynarnoi' medycyny ta biotehnologii' im. S.Z. Gzhyc'kogo [Scientifc Bulletin of the Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S.Z. Gzytsky]. Veterynarni nauky [Veterinary sciences]. Vol. 22, pp. 8–19. DOI:10.32718/nvlvet9902 (In Ukrainian).
  22. Pravyla peredzabijnogo veterynarnogo ogljadu tvaryn i veterynarno-sanitarnoi' ekspertyzy m’jasa ta m’jasnyh produktiv, zatverdzheni nakazom Golovy Derzhdepartamentu veterynarnoi' medycyny za № 28 vid 7.06.2002 r. ta zarejestrovani v Minjusti Ukrai'ny 21.06.2002 za № 524/6812. Pro zatverdzhennja Pravyl peredzabi...vid 07.06.2002 № 28 [Rules of pre-slaughter veterinary inspection of animals and veterinary-sanitary examination of meat and meat products, approved by the order of the Chairman of the State Department of Veterinary Medicine for № 28 from 7.06.2002 and registered in the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine on 21.06.2002 for № 524/6812. About the statement of Rules of pre - order ... from 07.06.2002 № 28.]. Kyiv, 2002, 27 p. Available at: https://rada.gov.ua (In Ukrainian).
  23. RST USSR 2002–90. M’jaso perepeliv. Tehnichni umovy. [Сhynnyj vid 1991–01–01] Vyd. ofc. Kyi'v [PCT of the Ukrainian SSR 2002–90. Quail meat. Specifcations. [Effective from 1991–01–01]. Kind. offcer. Kyiv, 1991, 9 p. Available at: http://csm. kiev.ua (In Ukrainian).
  24. DSTU 7992:2015. M’jaso ta m’jasna syrovyna. Metody vidbyrannja prob ta organoleptychnogo ocinjuvannja svizhosti [Сhynnyj 2017–01–01] Vyd. ofc. Kyi'v [DSTU 7992: 2015. Meat and raw meat. Methods of sampling and organoleptic evaluation of freshness [Сurrent 2017-01-01]. Kind. ofcer. Kyiv, 2015, 10 p. Available at: http://csm.kiev.ua (In Ukrainian).
  25. DSTU ISO 2917–2001. M’jaso ta m’jasnі produkti. Viznachennja RN (kontrol'nij metod) (ISO 2917:1974, ІDT) [Сhinnij vіd 2003–01–01] Vyd. ofc. Kyi'v [DSTU ISO 2917–2001. Meat and meat products. Determination of PH (control method) (ISO 2917: 1974, IDT) [Effective from 2003-01-01]. Kind. ofcer Kyiv, 10 p. Available at: http://csm. kiev.ua (In Ukrainian).
  26. DSTU 8253:2015. M’jaso ptyci. Metody himichnogo analizuvannja svizhosti. [Chynnyj vid 07.– 01.–2017] Vyd. ofc. Kyi'v [DSTU 8253: 2015. Poultry meat. Methods of chemical analysis of freshness. [Valid from 07. – 01. – 2017]. Kind. ofcer. Kyiv, 2015, 17 p. Available at:http://csm. kiev.ua (In Ukrainian).
  27. Bogatko, N.M., Bukalova, N.V., Prilіpko, T.M., Gruba, G.M., Bogatko, D.L. Sposib bakterioskopichnogo ocinjuvannja stupenja obsimeninnja m’jasa ptyci mikroorganizmamy: pat. 97931 Ukrai'ny, MPK G01N 33/12 (2006.01). № u 2014 11787; zajavl. 31.10.2014; opubl. 10.04.2015, Bjul. № 7. 4 s. Sposib bakterioskopichnogo ocinjuvannja stupenja obsimeninnja m’jasa ptyci mikroorganizmamy – UA 9793 [Method for bacterioscopic assessment of the degree of contamination of poultry meatwith microorganisms: pat. 97931 Ukraine, IPC G01N 33/12 (2006.01). № in 2014 11787; declared 31.10.2014; publ. 10.04.2015, Bull. № 7. 4 p. Method of bacterioscopic assessment of the degree of contamination of poultry meat with microorganisms – UA 9793]. Available at: http://uapatents.com (In Ukrainian).
  28. DSTU 8446:2015. Produkty harchovi. Metody vyznachennja kil'kosti mezofl'nyh aerobnyh ta fakul'tatyvno-anaerobnyh mikroorganizmiv. [chynnyj vid 2017–07–01] Vyd. ofc. Kyi'v [DSTU 8446: 2015. Food products. Methods for determining the number of mesophilic aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms. [Effective from 2017-07-01]. Kind. ofcer. Kyiv, 2017, 16 p. Available at: http://csm.kiev.ua (In Ukrainian).
  29. DSTU 8381:2015. M’jaso ta m’jasnі produkti. Organіzacіja ta metodi mіkrobіologіchnih doslіdzhen' [Chinnij vіd 01.07.2017] Vyd. ofc. Kyi'v [DSTU 8381:2015. Meat and meat products. Organization and methods of microbiological research [Effective from 01.07.2017]. Kind. ofcer. Kyiv, 2017, 48 p. Available at: http://csm.kiev.ua (In Ukrainian).
  30. DSTU EN 12824:2004. Mіkrobіologіja harchovih produktіv і kormіv dlja tvarin. Gorizontal'nij metod vijavlennja Salmonell. [Chinnij 2005–07–01]. Vyd. ofc. Kyi'v [DSTU EN 12824: 2004. Microbiology of food and animal feed. Horizontal method of Salmonell detection. [Current 2005-07-01]. Kind. ofcer. Kyiv, 2004, 24 p. Available at: http://csm.kiev.ua (In Ukrainian).
  31. DSTU ISO 6888–1:2003. Mikrobiologija harchovyh produktiv i kormiv dlja tvaryn. Goryzontal'nyj metod pidrahuvannja koagulazopozytyvnyh staflokokiv (Staphylococcus aureus ta inshyh vydiv). Chastyna 1. Metod z vykorystannjam agarovogo seredovyshha Bearu-Parkera. [Chynnyj vid 2004–10–01] Vyd. ofc. Kyi'v [DSTU ISO 6888–1: 2003. Microbiology of food and animal feed. Horizontal method of counting coagulase-positive staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other species). Part 1. Method using Bear-Parker agar medium. [Effective from 2004-10- 01]. Kind. ofcer. Kyiv, 2004, 14 p. Available at: http:// csm.kiev.ua (In Ukrainian).
  32. DSTU 7444–2013. Produkty harchovi. Metody vyjavlennja bakterij rodiv Proteus, Morganella, Providencia [Chynnyj vid 2014–07–01] Vyd. ofc. Kyi'v [DSTU 7444–2013. Food products. Methods for detecting bacteria of the genera Proteus, Morganella, Providence [Effective from 2014-07-01]. Kind. ofcer. Kyiv, 2013, 19 p. Available at: http://csm.kiev.uaДСТУ ISO 7937–2006. (In Ukrainian).
  33. DSTU ISO 7937–2006. Mikrobiologija harchovyh produktiv i kormiv dlja tvaryn. Goryzontal'nyj metod vyznachennja kil'kosti Clostridium perfringens. Tehnika pidrahuvannja kolonij. [Chynnyj 2007–10–01] Vyd. ofc. Kyi'v [DSTU ISO 7937–2006. Microbiology of food and animal feed. Horizontal method for determining the amount of Clostridium perfringens. Colony counting technique. [Current 2007–10–01] Kind. ofcer. Kyiv, 2006, 18 p. Available at: http://csm.kiev.ua (In Ukrainian).
  34. DSTU ISO 11290–1:2003. Mіkrobіologіja harchovih produktіv ta kormіv dlja tvarin. Gorizontal'nij metod vijavlennja ta pіdrahuvannja Listeria monocytogenes. Chastina 1. Metod vijavlennja. [Chinnij vid 2004–10–01] Vyd. ofc. Kyi'v [DSTU ISO 11290–1: 2003. Microbiology of food and animal feed. Horizontal method for detection and counting of Listeria monocytogenes. Part 1. Detection method. [Effective from 2004-10-01]. Kind. ofcer. Kyiv, 2003, 22 p. Available at: http://csm.kiev.ua (In Ukrainian).
  35. Mikitjuk, P.V. (2004). Metodychni vkazivky shhodo vykorystannja infuzorii' Tetrahimena piriformije (mikrometod) dlja toksykoz-biologichnoi' ocinky sil's'kogospodars'kyh produktiv ta vody [Methodological guidelines for the use of Tetrachymena piriformia infusoria (micromethod) for toxicological and biological assessment of agricultural products and water]. Bila Tserkva, 22 p. (In Ukrainian).
  36. DSTU 4823.2:2007. Produkti m’jasnі organoleptichne ocіnjuvannja pokaznikіv jakostі. Chastina 2. Zagal'nі vimogi. [Chinnij vid 2009–01–01] Vyd. ofc. Kyi'v [DSTU 4823.2: 2007. Meat products organoleptic evaluation of quality indicators. Part 2. General requirements. [Effective from 2009-01-01]. Kind. ofcer. Kyiv, 2008, 14 p. Available at: http://csm.kiev.ua (In Ukrainian).
  37. García, J.L., de Vicente, M., Galán, B. (2017). Microalgae have been used for centuries to provide nourishment to humans and animals, only very recently they have become much more widely cultured and harvested at large industrial scale. Microbial Biotechnology. Vol. 10, Issue 5, pp. 1017–1024. DOI:10.1111/1751- 7915.12800
  38. Alfaia, C.M., Pestana, J.M., Rodrigues, M., Coelho, D., Aires, M.J., Ribeiro, D.M., Major, V.T., Martins, C.F., Santos, H., Lopes, P.A. (2021). Influence of dietary Chlorella vulgaris and carbohydrate-active enzymes on growth performance, meat quality and lipid composition of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. Vol. 100, pp. 926–937. DOI:10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.034
  39. Furbeyre, H., Van Milgen, J., Mener, T., Gloaguen, M., Labussière, E. (2017). Effects of dietary supplementation with freshwater microalgae on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and gut health in weaned piglets. Animal. Vol. 11, pp. 183–192. DOI:10.1017/S1751731116001543
  40. Anjalai, K. (2020). Effect of dietary supplementation of Chlorella vulgaris (green microalgae) on egg quality characteristics of Japanese quail. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology. Vol. 24, pp. 51–55.
  41. Barros de Medeiros, V.P., da Costa, W.K.A., da Silva, R.T., Pimentel, T.C., Magnani, M. (2022). Microalgae as source of functional ingredients in new-generation foods: challenges, technological effects, biological activity, and regulatory issues. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. Vol. 62 (18), pp. 4929–4950. DOI:10.1080/ 10408398.2021.1879729
  42. Mishra, P., Das, R., Chaudhary, A., Mishra, B., Jha, R. (2023). Effects of microalgae, with or without xylanase supplementation, on growth performance, organs development, and gut health parameters of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, Vol. 102 (11), 103056 p. DOI:10.1016/j.psj.2023. 103056
  43. Abdel-Wareth, A.A.A., Williams, A.N., Salahuddin, M., Gadekar, S., Lohakare, J. (2024). Algae as an alternative source of protein in poultry diets for sustainable production and disease resistance: present status and future considerations. J. Front Vet Sci., Vol. 11:1382163. DOI:10.3389/ fvets.2024.1382163
  44. Pierre, G., Delattre, C., Dubessay, P., Jubeau, S., Vialleix, C., Cadoret, J.P., Probert, I., Michaud, P. (2019). What is in store for eps microalgae in the next decade? Molecules. Vol. 24 (23), 4296 p. DOI:10.3390/ molecules24234296
AttachmentSize
PDF icon zotsenko_1_2024.pdf514.28 KB